🤯 Why Gojek Vietnam Shut Down: $230M Burned Over 6 Years

Indonesia's super-app burned $230M and churned 4 CEOs in 6 years — here's why Gojek Vietnam shut down and lost ride-hailing to Grab and EV rival Xanh SM.

Author

Admond Lee
July 12, 2026

New here? Join us to become the top 1% founder by learning from startup failures:

P.S. Brands like Notion, Airwallex, Deel, and Intercom sponsor The Runway Ventures to reach founders who actually convert.

👉🏻 See why they do it

Hey Founders,

Welcome to The Runway Ventures — a weekly newsletter where I deep dive into failed startup stories to help you become the top 1% founder by learning from their mistakes with actionable insights.

Today's story is about an Indonesian super-app that burned $230M in Vietnam, cycled through 4 CEOs, and lost to Grab and an EV upstart. Let's get to it! 🚀

Today at a Glance:

  • ☠️ 1 Failed Startup → Gojek Vietnam

  • ⚠️ 2 Mistakes → Built growth on subsidies with no lock-in

  • 🧠 3 Lessons Learned → Switching costs are built with product (not price)

  • 🔗 The Runway Insights → How to write an email

  • 💰 Southeast Asia Funding Radar → GIM raises $20M (Series A) to build agentic AI systems generating autonomous investment hypotheses for capital markets research

☠️ 1 Failed Startup: Gojek Vietnam

🚀 The Rise of Gojek Vietnam

🇻🇳 Founded by Nguyễn Vũ Đức, Nguyễn Bảo Linh, and Phùng Tuấn Đức in August 2018 as GoViet (later rebranded to Gojek Vietnam in 2020), the company was the Vietnamese arm of Indonesian decacorn Gojek — a super-app running motorbike ride-hailing, food delivery, and courier services, aimed at breaking Grab's monopoly.

🕺🏻🕺🏻🕺🏻🕺🏻 Founders’ Story

Nguyễn Vũ Đức had a front-row seat to Uber's biggest mistake in Vietnam.

He interned at Uber during his Harvard MBA and helped launch Uber Vietnam in 2014. He urged them to focus on motorbikes — the actual way Vietnam moves. They didn't listen. Grab did.

So when Gojek came knocking in 2018 with $500M to invade Southeast Asia, Nguyễn saw a shot to build the Vietnamese ride-hailing champion Uber never was — alongside co-founders Bảo Linh and Tuấn Đức.

  • The Problem — 🛵 Grab had a near-monopoly on Vietnam's ride-hailing after buying out Uber's Southeast Asia business in March 2018. The result?

    • Millions of urban Vietnamese depended on motorbikes to get anywhere

    • Drivers had no leverage (Grab set the rules)

    • Consumers had no real alternative

  • The Solution — 🔴 GoViet built a super-app tailored for Vietnam, running Gojek's regional playbook but with local branding, a local team, and aggressive subsidies.

    • 0% commission for drivers + 1,000-5,000 VND flat-rate rides to break Grab's grip

    • Localised as "GoViet" with red branding, not Gojek's green

🇻🇳🔴 In short, GoViet was Gojek dressed up as a Vietnamese startup — same super-app playbook, red instead of green, aimed straight at Grab.

A woman wearing "ao dai" (traditional Vietnamese long dress) promoted GoViet during its launch ceremony in Hanoi, Vietnam 12 September 2018.

🤑 And guess what? The subsidies worked.

Within 6 weeks of launch, GoViet claimed 1.5 million app downloads, 25,000 drivers onboarded, and 35% market share in Ho Chi Minh City's motorbike segment.

🥳 Heck, Indonesian President Joko Widodo even flew to Hanoi for the grand launch alongside Gojek CEO Nadiem Makarim.

3 months later, GoFood joined the app — and within 2 months, GoViet said it was already Vietnam's leading food delivery service.

By August 2019, they'd hit 100 million trips across HCMC and Hanoi. A year later, they doubled it to 200 million.

🏔️ At its peak, Gojek Vietnam:

  • served 200,000+ driver partners and 80,000 restaurant partners

  • processed 200 million+ cumulative orders

  • held ~19% market share in ride-hailing (behind Grab's 60%)

  • operated across HCMC, Hanoi, Binh Duong, and Dong Nai

  • had ~400 employees (200 HQ + 200 call centre)

For a moment, it looked like GoViet had cracked the code Uber never did. Red bikes everywhere. President Widodo shaking hands in Hanoi. And subsidies flowing like water.

📉 The Fall of Gojek Vietnam

😲 But then... 4 CEOs happened.

Underneath the growth was a company that couldn't hold its own leadership team together, launched critical services years too late, and burned hundreds of millions of dollars trying to buy market share it never converted into ecosystem lock-in.

😤 By 2024, Gojek Vietnam was contributing less than 0.5% of GoTo's global GTV. Head office had seen enough.

📌 Here’s what happened to Gojek Vietnam:

🛵🔴 The red bike invasion

  • 24 May 2018 — 🚀 Gojek announced a $500 million war chest to enter Vietnam, Thailand, Singapore, and the Philippines after Uber's regional exit.

  • 1 Aug 2018 — GoViet publicly launched GoBike and GoSend in 12 districts of HCMC with 1,000-5,000 VND promo rides.

  • 12 Sep 2018 — Grand launch in Hanoi with Indonesian President Joko Widodo and Gojek CEO Nadiem Makarim. GoViet claimed 35% market share and 1.5M downloads within 6 weeks.

  • Mar 2019 — 🔥 GoViet raised driver commissions from 0% to 20% and tightened bonus thresholds. Drivers protested in the streets.

    • Founding CEO Nguyễn Vũ Đức and Deputy CEO Nguyễn Bảo Linh resigned, reportedly with an $800k severance ask on the way out.

  • 22 Apr 2019 — 👩‍💼 Lê Diệp Kiều Trang (Christy Le), ex-Facebook Vietnam Country Director with an MIT MBA, appointed as new CEO.

  • 19 Aug 2019 — Hit 100 million trips with 125,000 drivers and 70,000 restaurants. 400% growth in 12 months, on paper.

  • 18 Sep 2019 — 🔻 Christy Le resigned after just 5 months, citing "change in business structure from parent company." The CEO seat sat vacant for months.

  • 3 Jul 2020 — 🔄 GoViet officially rebranded to Gojek Vietnam. Phùng Tuấn Đức appointed CEO. Company reported 150K drivers, 80K restaurants, 200M cumulative orders.

🚕 Then Xanh SM rolled in

  • 19 Aug 2021 — 🚗 GoCar (4-wheel ride-hailing) finally launched in HCMC — 3 full years after entering Vietnam, and even then only for frontline healthcare workers under lockdown. Grab and Be had already locked up the car segment.

  • Apr 2022 — 📉 Parent GoTo Group IPO'd in Indonesia. The stock plunged over 80% within months. Public-market pressure demanded profitability by end of 2024.

  • 18 Jan 2023 — 🔻 CEO Phùng Tuấn Đức resigned. Sumit Rathor, from GoTo's regional team, appointed as first non-Vietnamese CEO with a mandate to cut burn.

  • 2023 — 🚕 Xanh SM — VinGroup's electric taxi service with an owned fleet and salaried drivers — launched. Within a year, it grabbed ~32% market share, shoving Gojek to 4th place.

    • Gojek Vietnam's revenue collapsed to 200 billion VND (vs Grab's 4,000+ billion VND). Accumulated losses hit ~5,700 billion VND (~$230M USD) over 6 years.

  • 4 Sep 2024 — GoTo announced Gojek would cease all Vietnam operations on 16 September. Vietnam was contributing less than 0.5% of GoTo's GTV.

  • 16 Sep 2024 — 🪦 Gojek Vietnam permanently shut down. 6 years. 4 CEOs. $230M in losses.

Gojek Vietnam didn't fail because Vietnamese consumers rejected an alternative to Grab. They wanted it. They downloaded the app 1.5 million times in 6 weeks.

The problem was that Gojek Vietnam couldn't hold a leadership team long enough to build a real ecosystem. GoCar shipped 3 years late. Their own e-wallet never shipped at all. And when GoTo went public and had to answer to shareholders, a market contributing less than 0.5% of GTV became the easy line to cut.

Subsidies bought market share. They just couldn't buy lock-in. Brutal? Hell yeah.

Want to learn more about Gojek Vietnam’s downfall?

⚠️ 2 Mistakes

Mistake 1: Built growth on subsidies with no lock-in

Launching with 0% commission for drivers and 1,000-5,000 VND rides made sense. Grab had a near-monopoly, and you don't break a monopoly at market prices. Subsidies were the crowbar.

🔥 And it worked. Fast. 1.5 million downloads and 35% HCMC market share within 6 weeks.

But nothing was built to survive the day the subsidies stopped:

  • No proprietary wallet to hold stored value → Gojek bought payment gateway WePay in 2020 but never shipped its own e-wallet

  • No car option until August 2021 → GoCar arrived 3 years late, so anyone who needed 4 wheels defaulted to Grab or Be

  • A weak delivery hook → GoFood stalled at ~3% of food-delivery GMV against GrabFood's 47%

💸 When commissions jumped from 0% to 20% in March 2019, drivers protested in the streets and both founding CEO Nguyễn Vũ Đức and Deputy CEO Bảo Linh resigned within weeks. By 2023, revenue had collapsed to 200 billion VND against Grab's 4,000+ billion.

Mistake 2: Sold local autonomy externally (kept central control internally)

Publicly, GoViet was a Vietnamese startup. Red branding. Vietnamese CEO. Positioned as a locally-led operation with Indonesian backing.

🤔 Internally? Look at the CEO exits:

  • Nguyễn Vũ Đức (Mar 2019) — resigned after an HQ-driven commission jump triggered driver strikes

  • Christy Le (Sep 2019) — resigned after 5 months, citing "change in business structure from the parent company in Indonesia"

  • Phùng Tuấn Đức (Jan 2023) — replaced by Indonesia-based Sumit Rathor, the first non-Vietnamese CEO

4 CEOs in 6 years all traced back to one unresolved question → was Vietnam a locally-led subsidiary or a branch office of Gojek Indonesia?

🧠 3 Lessons Learned

Lesson 1: Subsidies without lock-in are a countdown to churn

Grab had a near-monopoly, so Gojek Vietnam relied on subsidies to try to close the gap.

💸 But subsidies buy attention, not retention — and every dollar burned on acquisition is money spent on borrowed time. The clock only stops when you've built something users won't leave behind when the discount ends.

🌮 Key Takeaways:

  • Every subsidy campaign has an exit day baked in from day one — plan for it before you launch.

  • Cash-burn without a stickiness plan buys market share, never loyalty.

🛠️ Operator Playbook:

  • 📊 Design the subsidy-off test before you turn subsidies on

    • Ask: "When we normalise pricing, what makes users stay?"

    • Set a retention threshold you need to hit before pulling back — e.g., 60-day repeat rate ≥40% among discount-acquired users.

  • 🧪 Track subsidy-adjusted cohort retention monthly

    • Split cohorts by acquisition price → full subsidy vs partial vs full price.

    • Use Amplitude or Mixpanel to compare how each cohort behaves post-subsidy.

    • If subsidised cohorts churn 3-5x faster than organic ones, your subsidy is a leaky bucket, not a growth engine.

Lesson 2: Match public autonomy claims with real decision rights

Publicly, GoViet was a Vietnamese company.

But the March 2019 commission jump from 0% to 20% sparked driver protests and the founding CEO's resignation. When your public autonomy story doesn't match private decision rights, every leadership change becomes a rerun of the same conflict.

🌮 Key Takeaways:

  • If the local CEO can't set pricing, they can't set strategy either — that's a branch office wearing a subsidiary's clothes.

  • Every CEO transition in a competitive market costs 6-12 months of ground you can't buy back.

🛠️ Operator Playbook:

  • 📋 Document decision rights before hiring your local CEO

    • Write down which decisions are local (pricing, hiring, marketing) and which are HQ (regional strategy, capital allocation).

    • Revisit quarterly. Shifts in parent strategy often silently shrink local authority.

  • 🌏 Study how peers structured local autonomy in Southeast Asia

    • Look at the gap between org chart and reality → who actually approves pricing, hiring, and marketing calls at competing platforms.

    • Compare governance models across regional platforms — where authority sits determines how fast local teams can respond to market shocks.

Lesson 3: Switching costs are built with product (not price)

🥲 GoCar didn't launch until August 2021 — 3 years after Gojek entered Vietnam. Even more damaging: Gojek acquired local payment gateway WePay in 2020 but never rolled out a wallet, while Grab shipped Moca and Be shipped Cake/VPBank.

Without a product-based reason to stay, subsidised users had zero switching cost — and GoFood ended up at just 3% of food delivery GMV against GrabFood's 47%.

🌮 Key Takeaways:

  • In multi-service platforms, the payments layer creates the switching cost — the app itself doesn't.

  • If users can leave without losing anything they've built up with you, you don't have a moat.

🛠️ Operator Playbook:

  • 🔒 Ship a stored-value product early

    • Even a basic top-up wallet or credit ledger creates a reason to return.

    • Once users have stored value or credit with you, the switching cost compounds with every top-up.

    • If licensing is slow, partner with a local wallet immediately, not years later. Gojek finally integrated MoMo in July 2024.

  • 📱 Sequence new services to deepen the ecosystem (not just broaden it)

    • Ask: "Does this new service make it harder for existing users to leave?"

    • Every new service should compound switching cost — otherwise you're just adding features.

🔗 The Runway Insights

  • How to write an email (Read)

  • How to manage AI costs without killing adoption (Read)

  • What a founder who sold his last company for $780M is unlearning (Read)

  • 10 years, $50k MRR, a few hours a day (Read)

  • The most profitable skill of the 21st century (not AI) (Read)

💰 Southeast Asia Funding Radar

  • GIM raises $20M (Series A) to build agentic AI systems generating autonomous investment hypotheses for capital markets research (More)

  • Milo Drive secures $2.4M (Seed) to scale its electric mobility platform with backing from Caret Capital and Antler (More)

  • The Indus Valley bags $17M (Series B) to expand its toxin-free healthy cookware brand in India's growing premium kitchenware market (More)

💃 Rate Today’s Edition

What'd you think of today's edition?

Your feedback helps me create better content for you!

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

That’s all for today

Thanks for reading. I hope you enjoyed today's issue. More than that, I hope you’ve learned some actionable tips to build and grow your business.

You can always write to me by simply replying to this newsletter and we can chat.

See you again next week.

- Admond

Disclaimer: The Runway Ventures content is for informational purposes only. Unless otherwise stated, any opinions expressed above belong solely to the author.

Reply

or to participate.